Hyundai Santa FE 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 14 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |