Hyundai Santa FE 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai Santa FE) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 72 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2004 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |