Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.4 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is smaller. Hyundai Santa FE is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 969 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1582 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 356 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 255 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC90 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Hyundai Santa FE, so Hyundai Santa FE quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |