Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 11 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1582 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 490 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |