Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 19 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1582 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 195 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |