Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 29 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.4 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 14 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1582 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 567 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |