Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is smaller. Hyundai Santa FE is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 969 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2274 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 356 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 437 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC90 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai Santa FE, so Hyundai Santa FE quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |