Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 5 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2274 litres | 955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 413 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 1319 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |