Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai Santa FE) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-7) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-7 2007: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE and Mazda CX-7 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 514 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |