Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 68 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Santa FE is 7 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 9 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Santa FE, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |