Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 195 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |