Hyundai Santa FE 2006 vs BMW X5 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 165 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Santa FE is 1 cm longer than the BMW X5, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 969 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 504 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`695 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai Santa FE, so Hyundai Santa FE quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
BMW X5 has
| |