Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 7 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 4 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 528 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 1.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`329 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests, but Chevrolet Captiva is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |