Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 47 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 14 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 524 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 4 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |