Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 18 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Used also on Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 13 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |