Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 47 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 49 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |