Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 199 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 223 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Hyundai Santa FE has 246 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |