Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 422 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1220 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
Hyundai Santa FE and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 774 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Hyundai Santa FE has 246 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9200 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |