Hyundai Santa FE 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 13 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Used also on Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1577 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Santa FE has 51 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The Chevrolet Captiva may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests, but Chevrolet Captiva is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |