Hyundai Santa FE 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 421 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 47 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 585 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 4 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |