Hyundai Santa FE 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 421 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 67 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 585 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 35 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 307 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |