Hyundai Santa FE 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 421 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 47 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 585 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 986 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 440 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 584 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |