Hyundai Santa FE 2012 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 421 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 13 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Used also on Opel Antara | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 8 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 585 litres | 97 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 585 litres | 477 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 1577 litres | |
In 5-seat version Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space (by 108 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 7 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 1.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 12 400 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |