Hyundai Santa FE 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 421 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 47 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai Santa FE has 55 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Hyundai Santa FE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`600 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Santa FE scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |