Hyundai Santa FE 2020 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 202 HP | 247 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 570 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.5 | |
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 89 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
Hyundai Santa FE is smaller. Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 7 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 571 litres | 782 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 571 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 782 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | 1554 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 95 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`949 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 40 000 | 25 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |