Hyundai Santa FE 2020 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 72 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger. Hyundai Santa FE is 10 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 571 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 571 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | 1877 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 40 000 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |