Hyundai Santa FE 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 516 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1615 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 381 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |