Hyundai Santa FE 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 436 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Santa FE is 8 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 75 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |