Hyundai Santa FE 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Used also on Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Santa FE is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 516 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1615 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Santa FE has 21 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |