Hyundai Santa FE 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 516 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1615 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 183 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |