Hyundai Santa FE 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 516 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1615 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Hyundai Santa FE has 34 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |