Hyundai Matrix 2008 vs Mazda 5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Matrix engine produces 41 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Matrix reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Hyundai Matrix is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Hyundai Matrix over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is smaller. Hyundai Matrix is 48 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 354 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1284 litres | 1566 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`840 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`535 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 715 kg | |
| Hyundai Matrix load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Mazda 5. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai Matrix has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai Matrix, so Hyundai Matrix quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |