Hyundai Matrix 2004 vs Suzuki SX4 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 123 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Hyundai Matrix engine produces 16 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki SX4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2006 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.56 m | |
| Hyundai Matrix is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1045 litres | |
|
Hyundai Matrix has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Suzuki SX4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Matrix has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |