Hyundai Matrix 2004 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Matrix engine produces 5 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 9 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Matrix might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.52 m | |
| Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |