Hyundai Matrix 2004 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Hyundai Matrix engine produces 33 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Hyundai Matrix is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage space. Hyundai Matrix has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |