Hyundai Matrix 2004 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 141 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Hyundai Matrix engine produces 19 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 23 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.52 m | |
Hyundai Matrix is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
Hyundai Matrix has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`730 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |