Hyundai Matrix 2004 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Matrix engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Matrix reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Matrix could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is smaller. Hyundai Matrix is 26 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |