Hyundai Matrix 2001 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Matrix engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Matrix reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Hyundai Matrix over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Getz | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Matrix engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Hyundai Matrix is 22 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has more luggage space. Hyundai Matrix has 67 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Matrix is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Hyundai Matrix can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Matrix has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |