Hyundai Matrix 2001 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Matrix engine produces 32 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Matrix reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Hyundai Matrix is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Matrix consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Hyundai Matrix over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera Tino engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Getz | Used also on Nissan Almera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Matrix engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai Matrix is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1284 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Hyundai Matrix has 90 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 666 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |