Hyundai Matrix 2001 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai Matrix is available only with front wheel drive, while Hyundai ix35 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 123 HP | 115 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 235 NM | 164 - 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 17.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai ix35 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Hyundai Matrix. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.1 | 5.2 - 9.2 | |
|
Hyundai Matrix petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Hyundai Matrix equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is smaller. Hyundai Matrix is 39 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Matrix is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1284 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Hyundai Matrix has 237 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Matrix is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Hyundai Matrix can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`813 kg | ~ 2`044 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`335 kg | ~ 1`498 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 478 kg | ~ 546 kg | |
| Hyundai Matrix load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Hyundai ix35. Therefore, Hyundai ix35 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Matrix has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |