Hyundai Kona 2024 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Kona) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 62 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 290 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 1.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.20 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 3730 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 466 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1300 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Hyundai Kona has 125 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 83 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`885 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |