Hyundai Kona 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Kona) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 276 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 1.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.80 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 3730 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 722 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1804 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 421 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`020 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |