Hyundai Kona 2023 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Kona) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 51 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Toyota C-HR. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 43 litres | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 722 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1804 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`940 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 30 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |