Hyundai Kona 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Kona) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 201 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Hyundai Kona is smaller. Hyundai Kona is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 722 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1804 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 421 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`855 kg | 2`490 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`363 kg | 1`891 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 492 kg | 599 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |