Hyundai Kona 2021 vs Nissan Juke 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai Kona) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Juke) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 42 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 172 NM more than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Juke 2022 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1156 litres | 1237 litres | |
| Hyundai Kona has 20 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 81 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`965 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`287 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 448 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Nissan Juke. Therefore, Hyundai Kona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |