Hyundai Kona 2021 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai Kona) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi ASX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 42 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 172 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1156 litres | 1149 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 7 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`965 kg | 1`896 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 476 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |