Hyundai Kona 2021 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Despite less power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Hyundai Kona is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1156 litres | 710 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`451 kg | 1`185 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 429 kg | 545 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |