Hyundai Kona 2018 vs Seat Arona 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Kona is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Kona engine produces 41 HP more power than Seat Arona, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Seat Arona. Thanks to more power Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.2 | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 177 mm (7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1143 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Hyundai Kona uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Arona, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`950 kg | 1`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`497 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 453 kg | 585 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Seat Arona. Therefore, Seat Arona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Seat Arona has
| |