Hyundai Kona 2019 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Arona, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Seat Arona. Despite less power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1143 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Hyundai Kona uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`376 kg | 1`119 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 504 kg | 601 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Seat Arona. Therefore, Seat Arona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Seat Arona has
| |