Hyundai Kona 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 43 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 107 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Kona is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |